Data from: Brain criticality predicts individual levels of inter-areal synchronization in human electrophysiological data

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Helsinki - Siebenhühner, Felix
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgow - Fusca, Marco
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Helsinki - Wang, Sheng Hua
dc.contributor.affiliationAalto University - Myrov, Vladislav
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Genoa - Arnulfo, Gabriele
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Genoa - Nobili, Lino
dc.contributor.affiliationAalto University - Palva, J Matias
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgow - Palva, Satu
dc.contributor.authorSiebenhühner, Felix
dc.contributor.authorFusca, Marco
dc.contributor.authorWang, Sheng Hua
dc.contributor.authorMyrov, Vladislav
dc.contributor.authorArnulfo, Gabriele
dc.contributor.authorNobili, Lino
dc.contributor.authorPalva, J Matias
dc.contributor.authorPalva, Satu
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-24T15:17:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-27
dc.date.issued2023-06-27
dc.descriptionNeuronal oscillations and their synchronization between brain areas are fundamental for healthy brain function. Yet, synchronization levels exhibit large inter-individual variability that is associated with behavioral variability. We test whether individual synchronization levels are predicted by individual brain states along an extended regime of critical-like dynamics – the Griffiths phase (GP). We use computational modelling to assess how synchronization is dependent on brain criticality indexed by long-range temporal correlations (LRTCs). We analyze LRTCs and synchronization of oscillations from resting-state magnetoencephalography and stereo-electroencephalography data. Synchronization and LRTCs are both positively linearly and quadratically correlated among healthy subjects, while in epileptogenic areas they are negatively linearly correlated. These results show that variability in synchronization levels is explained by the individual position along the GP with healthy brain areas operating in its subcritical and epileptogenic areas in its supercritical side. We suggest that the GP is fundamental for brain function allowing individual variability while retaining functional advantages of criticality.
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vdncjsxzn
dc.identifier.urihttps://hydatakatalogi-test-24.it.helsinki.fi/handle/123456789/10089
dc.rightsOpen
dc.rights.licensecc-zero
dc.subjectphase synchrony
dc.subjectMagnetoencephalography
dc.subjectstereo-electroencephalography
dc.subjectDetrended Fluctuation Analysis
dc.titleData from: Brain criticality predicts individual levels of inter-areal synchronization in human electrophysiological data
dc.typedataset
dc.typedataset

Files

Repositories