Data from: Metacommunity structure of stream insects across three hierarchical spatial scales
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Nanjing Agricultural University - He, Siwen | |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Helsinki - Soininen, Janne | |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Jiuzhaigou Administrative Bureau* - Deng, Guiping | |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Nanjing Agricultural University - Wang, Beixin | |
| dc.contributor.author | He, Siwen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Soininen, Janne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Deng, Guiping | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Beixin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-24T15:19:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-01-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-01-30 | |
| dc.description | A major challenge in community ecology is to understand the underlying factors driving metacommunity (i.e. a set of local communities connected through species dispersal) dynamics. However, little is known about the effects of varying spatial scale on the relative importance of environmental and spatial (i.e. dispersal related) factors in shaping metacommunities and on the relevance of different dispersal pathways. Using a hierarchy of insect metacommunities at three spatial scales (a small, within-stream scale, intermediate, among-stream scale, and large, among-sub-basin scale), we assessed whether the relative importance of environmental and spatial factors shaping metacommunity structure varies predictably across spatial scales, and tested how the importance of different dispersal routes vary across spatial scales. We also studied if different dispersal ability groups differ in the balance between environmental and spatial control. Variation partitioning showed that environmental factors relative to spatial factors were more important for community composition at the within-stream scale. In contrast, spatial factors (i.e. eigenvectors from Moran's eigenvector maps) relative to environmental factors were more important at the among-sub-basin scale. These results indicate that environmental filtering is likely to be more important at the smallest scale with highest connectivity, while dispersal limitation seems to be more important at the largest scale with lowest connectivity. Community variation at the among-stream and among-sub-basin scales were strongly explained by geographical and topographical distances, indicating that overland pathways might be the main dispersal route at the larger scales among more isolated sites. The relative effect of environmental and spatial factors on insect communities varied between low and high dispersal ability groups; this variation was inconsistent among three hierarchical scales. In sum, our study indicates that spatial scale, connectivity and dispersal ability jointly shape stream metacommunities. | |
| dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.stqjq2c0g | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hydatakatalogi-test-24.it.helsinki.fi/handle/123456789/10336 | |
| dc.rights | Open | |
| dc.rights.license | cc-zero | |
| dc.title | Data from: Metacommunity structure of stream insects across three hierarchical spatial scales | |
| dc.type | dataset | |
| dc.type | dataset |